Are 2 Inch Eyepieces Worth It. Compare various models and find. 2” eyepieces are generally heavier and more expensive. — both eyepiece sizes have their unique benefits: — typically 2 eyepieces are used for lower magnification and or wider field of view. — as far as 1.25 vs 2”, the major difference is that a 2” allows for a wider field stop and in turn a wider tfov. There’s no downside to using 1.25” eps, they’re just limited to a field stop that can only get so big, so the tfov in a 1.25” eyepiece can only be so wide. 1.25″ eyepieces tend to be more affordable and compatible with a variety of telescopes, while 2″ eyepieces offer a wider field of view, greater comfort, and a more immersive viewing experience. — a 2″ eyepiece delivers a wider true field of view (the actual amount of sky visible) than a 1¼” eyepiece of the same focal length. However, at say 16mm in a. A 2 barrel will allow for a. — it makes sense using a 2 inch eyepiece at focal lengths over 25mm, because of afov limitations.
from www.cloudynights.com
— as far as 1.25 vs 2”, the major difference is that a 2” allows for a wider field stop and in turn a wider tfov. Compare various models and find. There’s no downside to using 1.25” eps, they’re just limited to a field stop that can only get so big, so the tfov in a 1.25” eyepiece can only be so wide. — a 2″ eyepiece delivers a wider true field of view (the actual amount of sky visible) than a 1¼” eyepiece of the same focal length. — typically 2 eyepieces are used for lower magnification and or wider field of view. However, at say 16mm in a. 2” eyepieces are generally heavier and more expensive. — it makes sense using a 2 inch eyepiece at focal lengths over 25mm, because of afov limitations. A 2 barrel will allow for a. — both eyepiece sizes have their unique benefits:
Old 2 inch eyepiece Eyepieces Cloudy Nights
Are 2 Inch Eyepieces Worth It There’s no downside to using 1.25” eps, they’re just limited to a field stop that can only get so big, so the tfov in a 1.25” eyepiece can only be so wide. A 2 barrel will allow for a. However, at say 16mm in a. There’s no downside to using 1.25” eps, they’re just limited to a field stop that can only get so big, so the tfov in a 1.25” eyepiece can only be so wide. Compare various models and find. 2” eyepieces are generally heavier and more expensive. — as far as 1.25 vs 2”, the major difference is that a 2” allows for a wider field stop and in turn a wider tfov. 1.25″ eyepieces tend to be more affordable and compatible with a variety of telescopes, while 2″ eyepieces offer a wider field of view, greater comfort, and a more immersive viewing experience. — a 2″ eyepiece delivers a wider true field of view (the actual amount of sky visible) than a 1¼” eyepiece of the same focal length. — both eyepiece sizes have their unique benefits: — typically 2 eyepieces are used for lower magnification and or wider field of view. — it makes sense using a 2 inch eyepiece at focal lengths over 25mm, because of afov limitations.
